“...there is no such thing as objective journalism. The phrase itself is a pompous contradiction of terms.” – Dr. Hunter S. Thompson.
Whether we admit it or not all journalism is fraught with opinion. A friend recently forwarded an article from the Post which she thought might make good material for the blog. She was right, it was a really interesting stuff – the kind of stuff I should have been able to sink my teeth into. Should have, but couldn’t. I was unsure of my opinion, I couldn’t find my stand. It turns out that without some sort of subjective stance I have no article to write, therefore proving Dr. Thompson’s quote, which I used to open this blog, particularly relevant.
Rather than allowing the dilatory pace of my own ethical compass to delay sharing the article any longer I decided I would just post it. These are complicated issues that we as a society are going to have to deal with. They are not going away. Read about it. Think about it. Talk about it.
Life in Henry's wake
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Initially the idea of selecting an embryo to serve a particular purpose is repulsive to me, and I'm not a big fan of IVF for a variety of reasons. But I don't have a critically ill child and I'm sure if I did, I would do anything I could to save that child. Then I wonder about the psychological impact on a child that was conceived to save their sibling, particularly if it doesn't work. I'm not sure where I stand, but I'm glad you went ahead and posted the article so there can be some dialogue.
ReplyDelete